Annex Note 6e3f

The present matter was first treated as a movement error, then as a filing error, and then as an avoidable naming issue. None of these classifications have improved outcomes. Relocation has not produced stability. The discrepancy appears to travel with the description.

Review of the custody sequence confirms that the paperwork can remain valid while the destinations multiply. Review of the acknowledgement transcript confirms that staff can receive accurate instructions for spaces that do not hold still long enough to be mapped. The error therefore should not be assigned to shelving, transit, or night staff alone.

Pending broader guidance, staff are advised to minimise descriptive language, maintain route discipline, and avoid assuming that closure of the file will also close the condition. This assumption has not tested well.